media archaeology

More than twenty years ago I discovered the daguerreotype — one of the earliest of photographic media. Images are formed in a camera on polished light sensitive silver-plated copper—on mirrors. These are not just simply early photographs. They are unique one-off images, and positive-negative—you have to catch the mirrored surface at the right angle, reflecting a dark background, for the image to appear. The process was made available to the public in 1839 and millions were produced between until the late 1850s when the process was eclipsed by the likes of ambrotypes and tintypes that are much more easily viewed. Most were posed portraits. Most of the names of the people in the relatively few daguerreotypes that survive have been forgotten.

Daguerreotypes are delicate, scratch easily, oxidize, corrode, and fade. My archaeological sensibilities draw me to those that are damaged, discarded, neglected. A few years ago I gathered a collection of about fifty. All have lost their protective cases. Many appear blank at first glance. These degraded images are hard to find, even on eBay, because no one wants them, but then they are cheap when you do find them. All mine are the small standard sixth plate size—2 3/4 by 3 1/4 inches.

I wanted to share the experience of looking at these quite extraordinary things, though there is no substitute for holding them in the palm of your hand. I couldn’t at first capture well with a camera or lighting technique the images left in the tainted mirrored surfaces. But then I discovered that my scanner picked up what you couldn’t or could hardly see by just looking at the plate. Later I managed to get the lighting right and could catch the portraits in high magnification with a camera, and daguerreotypes are well known for their extraordinarily high resolution.

These are uncanny images [Link]. The people in the mirrored surface come alive again, portraits reincarnated through re-mediation, re-photography. If we consider that archaeology is work done upon the remains of the past, then these images are a kind of media archaeology.

I called the project ghosts in the mirror – [Link]

Today I was organizing the project archive and noticed something new. One of the plates seems to have entirely lost its image.

Here is a detail of an oblique close up.

Then the thumbnail caught my eye.

There seems to be a face.

Here is a re-edit of that view. A ghost most certainly. Or am I deceived in pareidolia? [Link arguing the contrary]

Fascinating that a low resolution image lets us see into things more clearly, taking in a gestalt.

So degraded, ruined, yet present, and even with the medium so conspicuously apparent, the image in the shadows and behind a veil of decay. I am reminded intensely of Adorno’s aphorism—“the best magnifying glass is a splinter in the eye”.

We sometimes think that the way to reproduce presence, a sense of of “being here”, is through rich immersive media. To the contrary, these tiny, almost opaque windows, or rather mirrors on the past, bridge the temporal gap between then and now through the faintest of traces.

Here is a slideshow of some of the collection https://www.archaeographer.com/Ghosts-in-the-mirror

A book is available here – [Link]